uberreiniger: (Harry D&D)
[personal profile] uberreiniger
In spite of the Harry Potter series now being more spoiled than a cottage cheese in a New Orleans refrigerator, I nevertheless finished reading Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire today and I must say, I'm glad I did.

The lingering problem of other preceeding Harry Potter book still exists here, which is if you're not Harry, Hermione, one of the Weasleys, or an adult, you can pretty much forget about anything like character development. I understand that Rowling has a LOT of characters to juggle here, but there are scores of characters who have been a heavy presence since Book 1 whom we still know absolutely nothing about.

It has been difficult for me not to find annoyance in the wizards' general bewilderment and ignorance regarding modern technology or clothing. But then something finally dawned on me: whatever else Harry Potter might be, it is, first and foremost, a childrens' book. (Yes, that's right. Unfortunately for all you slash-writing pedophile fangirls, they are CHILDRENS' BOOKS.) And part of the fun of childrens' books for kids is that they get to see grown-up characters acting like idiots. Once I finally comprehended this, I was no longer bothered.

The tone of this book is remarkably different from the others, becoming darker and more urgent than past installments have been from the moment Harry's name enters the cup. It became a very different sort of book, yet retained everything we've come to enjoy about HP. Not an easy thing to do. Everyone does a lot of "growing up" in this story (and given how it ends, how could they not?) Even Dumbledor seems to mature as he is forced to reevaluate the insular, often elitist society of which he is a part and question whether it as a whole is truly up to what lies ahead. What's great about all of this is the way that Rowling expresses so much of it by way of implication rather than direct statement. Many authors writing to young people would be afraid to try that. Not only does Rowling try it again and again, but she succeeds.

I saw something in this book I've never seen before. I groaned at the end when Voldemort starts acting like an Evil Overlord, setting Harry free so they can fight "honorably" rather than just killing him outright. This could have just served as a deus ex machina to get a weapon back in the hero's hand in order to give the ultra-arrogant insane bad guy his comeupance. But again, Rowling's powers of implication were at work. This wasn't just some overused plot device. Voldemort's words and actions leading up to it led me to understand that Voldemort needed to prove to himself that he could really defeat the person who'd been the bane of his existence on his own. Most people don't give that kind of development to their villains and it was refreshing. I was sort of bothered by the fact that it's stated earlier in the book that no one but Voldemort knows who all the Death Eaters are, yet at the end he's standing there just naming them all off to each other. Maybe he just thought the time for secrecy had passed? Possible, but it wasn't explained very well.

All in all a good book that has me eager to read more now that the story's finally picking up. Oh, and big points for the twist ending which I never once even guessed was coming... and then the further twist after the twist which twisted everything back around again.

Date: 2005-09-14 11:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rustie25.livejournal.com
You think way too much :) I am too simple, I guess. I just take the book for what it is (in my opinion), a good story. Sometimes I think my reading abilities are way too immature for me. I can see what you mean by everything you say, and yet I would never pick that out on my own. This is why I hate teaching language arts.
Book 5 gets much darker :) Book 4 was my favorite. I can't wait for the movie. I need to reread book 6 because I was so anxious to get to the end, I didn't stop to enjoy the details.

Date: 2005-09-14 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] shadowfell.livejournal.com
I must have your icon. That's awesome.

Date: 2005-09-14 03:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberreiniger.livejournal.com
I don't know who made it, but it's one of the most hilarious things I've ever seen. Feel free to use it.

Date: 2005-09-14 03:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ksracxe.livejournal.com
bwahahahahahahahhahahahah

I'm attacking the DARKNESS!! ! !! !! !! !

I must have it.

Date: 2005-09-14 04:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberreiniger.livejournal.com
You attack it. I will do the chicks who are there!

Date: 2005-09-14 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-dark.livejournal.com
I'm getting drunk!!!

Date: 2005-09-14 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] darkemoone.livejournal.com
Oh my God! That icon! SO FUNNY!!

Date: 2005-09-14 04:32 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] batchix.livejournal.com
guh~ wait till you read #5. HARRY BECOMES EMO~ OH THE ANGST! I am stealing your icon.

Date: 2005-09-15 05:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberreiniger.livejournal.com
Eh, I put up with Krum's emo all through this one. I'm prepared.

Date: 2005-09-14 07:53 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-dark.livejournal.com
Um, minor request here: there are some (aka those who haven't read the books but are watching the films) to whom the -subject- line is a massive spoiler.

AKA: Jenn doesn't know Voldy is coming back, in the flesh. No one who hasn't read the books but has seen all three movies knows that, unless they've run across spoilerish casting notices and whatnot.

Just a thought. :)

Oh, and if you think THIS one is dark, and a major change in tone...woo howdy. I have one line from the next book, Order of the Phoenix, that will remain anonymous. It's a paraphrase at that, but I guarantee your face will break into a huge grin when you hit it.

'You assume I will go quietly. Let me assure you that I do not intend to go quietly.'

Date: 2005-09-15 05:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberreiniger.livejournal.com
The subject line is not a spoiler. It doesn't say anything about him coming back in the flesh, it just says he's alive. You've read the first book you know he's alive. If you've even heard of a book series called Harry Potter, odds are you know there's a guy called Voldemort who is bad and very much alive if somewhat the worse for wear.

Date: 2005-09-15 06:30 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mr-dark.livejournal.com
Ah, but the text and the films both comment on the fact that he isn't really -alive-, but rather has kept himself in a 'half-life' by drinking the unicorn blood.

So neener. :P

Date: 2005-09-15 06:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] uberreiniger.livejournal.com
Neener on you. In fiction a character's either alive or it's dead. Dead means they don't make appearances in the text anymore (flashbacks excluded, of course.) Even dead Cthulu who lies dreaming in the city of R'yleah is "alive"... and he proves it!

Profile

uberreiniger: (Default)
uberreiniger

July 2015

S M T W T F S
   1234
5 67891011
12131415161718
1920 2122232425
262728293031 

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 5th, 2025 06:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios