Uberreiniger Presents: Fun With The Law!
Nov. 11th, 2003 10:31 amThat Robert Durst guy got away with it. The guy's a twisted freak, but you've got to hand it to anyone who admits to killing someone and chopping them up, then gets away with it. In case you don't know what I'm talking about and are sitting there going "that dude from Limp Bizkit did WHAAAT!?" Go here. http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=514&e=2&u=/ap/20031111/ap_on_re_us/fugitive_heir
This has inspired me to bring a new feature to this journal. Uberreiniger Presents: Fun With The Law! Today we will be tackling one of the funnest portions of constitutional law I know of: The double jeopardy clause!
DOUBLE JEOPARDY: The thing which makes it so that you cannot be tried more than once for the same crime.
Sound boring? Guess again! On a rainy day, make some kool-aid pops in the freezer and try the following fun activity.
1) Save up some money. You'll need it for Step 3. Trust me.
2) Kill someone. Preferably someone dangerous or violent or who molests children. This may sound like a lot more work, but it can potentially help out in Step 4.
3) Hire a really good defense attorney. I hear the guy who defended Robert Dursts's schedule just opened up...
4) Be found not guilty in the ensuing trial. While it's general consensus that any way you can manage to win your trial you should probably do, I recommend a strategy that will prove you were nowhere near the scene at the time of the murder, had never met the deceased, and had absolutely no motive. It will make Step 5 funnier.
5) Immediately following reading of Not Guilty verdict, go outside courthouse to talk to waiting reporters. When asked how you feel, look straight at the TV camera and say "Well, now that I've been found innocent and thanks to double jeopardy, cannot be tried for it again, I'd just like to say from the bottom of my heart how glad I am I killed the sonofabitch!"
Ta-Da! You have now just had fun with double jeopardy! Wasn't that a hoot? And the best part is, there's not a damn thing anybody can do about it. Sure, you may still have that pesky civil trial to deal with, but it will be worth it for the looks on all their faces. Especially your defense attorney's!
DISCLAINER: Have fun kiddies, but please don't actually kill someone because I told you to. I would then be associated with gangsta rappers and would be very embarassed.
This has inspired me to bring a new feature to this journal. Uberreiniger Presents: Fun With The Law! Today we will be tackling one of the funnest portions of constitutional law I know of: The double jeopardy clause!
DOUBLE JEOPARDY: The thing which makes it so that you cannot be tried more than once for the same crime.
Sound boring? Guess again! On a rainy day, make some kool-aid pops in the freezer and try the following fun activity.
1) Save up some money. You'll need it for Step 3. Trust me.
2) Kill someone. Preferably someone dangerous or violent or who molests children. This may sound like a lot more work, but it can potentially help out in Step 4.
3) Hire a really good defense attorney. I hear the guy who defended Robert Dursts's schedule just opened up...
4) Be found not guilty in the ensuing trial. While it's general consensus that any way you can manage to win your trial you should probably do, I recommend a strategy that will prove you were nowhere near the scene at the time of the murder, had never met the deceased, and had absolutely no motive. It will make Step 5 funnier.
5) Immediately following reading of Not Guilty verdict, go outside courthouse to talk to waiting reporters. When asked how you feel, look straight at the TV camera and say "Well, now that I've been found innocent and thanks to double jeopardy, cannot be tried for it again, I'd just like to say from the bottom of my heart how glad I am I killed the sonofabitch!"
Ta-Da! You have now just had fun with double jeopardy! Wasn't that a hoot? And the best part is, there's not a damn thing anybody can do about it. Sure, you may still have that pesky civil trial to deal with, but it will be worth it for the looks on all their faces. Especially your defense attorney's!
DISCLAINER: Have fun kiddies, but please don't actually kill someone because I told you to. I would then be associated with gangsta rappers and would be very embarassed.
Why I won't be a defense attorney
Date: 2003-11-11 09:21 am (UTC)It's insane that he walked, but the sad thing is that it happens all too often. I could cite some cases to you that would really get your blood boiling.
Re: Why I won't be a defense attorney
Date: 2003-11-12 12:11 am (UTC)Oh well, at least some good has come out of this trial. At least now I know there are at least twelve people in the world who I'm smarter than.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 09:38 am (UTC)Ahhhh, justice
Date: 2003-11-11 11:38 am (UTC)Another issue that the jury brought up was that the Prosecution changed their possible scenario at the end of the trial - if so, that was a stupid decision on the Prosecution's side.
So, you can feel free to kill your friend as long as you have no motive and get a retarded jury that doesn't understand their charge. And if you get lucky enough to be up against a stubborn (if they weren't so bent on getting the murder charge, they probably would have been successful on a lesser charge where "reasonable doubt" isn't such a factor) and apparently not-so-smart Prosecution team, it will be easy as pie.
Sad, but sometimes true.
Re: Ahhhh, justice
Date: 2003-11-11 11:51 pm (UTC)BILL O'REILLY: Would you trust this guy Durst to eat dinner with your children unsupervised?
DURST'S LAWYER: Well, I don't have any children but I'd trust the love of my life my dog to be walked by him unsupervised!
They have said time and time again that this trial was taking place in Texas. It wasn't until I heard this statement that I truly appreciated exactly what that meant.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 11:46 am (UTC)or would that be wrong?
btw.. how are things? you've for some reason been a reocurring person in some of my recent dreams.... hmm...subliminal cries for help methinks.
no subject
Date: 2003-11-11 11:47 pm (UTC)