Fun with Kirk Cameron
Dec. 8th, 2009 02:45 pmIt doesn't get really good until 1:35 when he mentions Darwin's racism and sexism, as if those two things have anything to do with the validity of his scientific theories. For extra fun is Hitler's "undeniable connection" to Darwinism. Surprisingly, Hitler's "undeniable connection" to the works of Martin Luther and Protestantism go unmentioned.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 09:01 pm (UTC)Does he just not want to say Secular Jews?
no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 09:02 pm (UTC)No, it's great.
"We want to give students the opposing and correct view. We want you to learn both sides and pick ours."
no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 01:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 04:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 02:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 06:48 am (UTC)Frankly I think the whole argument is a waste of time no matter what side you're on. Frankly the Kirk Camerons and the Richard Dawkinses of the world deserve each other and I don't have an ounce of respect for any of them.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 03:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 04:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 01:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 09:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-08 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 02:17 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 06:51 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 07:49 pm (UTC)And it had to be a banana of all things. By this train of thought (my train of thought), I could demonstrate how neatly the human penis fits into the human ass thereby proving the entire human race is meant to be a bunch of bisexual whores!
no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 07:57 pm (UTC)LOL!
Date: 2009-12-11 05:37 am (UTC)I'm not sure why this is so funny, but it is.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 02:43 am (UTC)As both a Christian and a lay-scientist, I say...
Date: 2009-12-09 03:24 am (UTC)They are compatible, since they deal with entirely different things. What I want to know is why so many people keep trying to create a conflict where there isn't one.
Re: As both a Christian and a lay-scientist, I say...
Date: 2009-12-09 07:20 pm (UTC)Science is about taking observations, deriving a theory and set of a priori hypotheses, and then experimenting to see if they hold. It would be impossible to prove the existence of a deity in such a manner.
Faith is about believing something in spite of all evidence to the contrary. If it could be proven, then you cannot by definition have faith.
Someone please tell the creation scientists this.
Re: As both a Christian and a lay-scientist, I say...
Date: 2009-12-10 04:10 am (UTC)I'll just have to keep trying.
Re: As both a Christian and a lay-scientist, I say...
Date: 2009-12-10 06:44 am (UTC)Re: As both a Christian and a lay-scientist, I say...
Date: 2009-12-11 05:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 04:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 07:25 pm (UTC)The people who crashed planes into the WTC didn't do it because of religion. They did it because they felt powerless, and it was convenient to blame America for their problems. The religious rhetoric was merely layered on top. If it was truly a jihad, they'd have crashed a bunch of planes into mega-churches in the US south. It's not a coincidence that they chose a target with economic meaning.
But in general, I agree with you.
no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 03:27 am (UTC)*goes back to reading
ETA: I forgot to mention that a lot of people are probably athiests because so many highly public Christians act like a-holes (Recent President Bush and Anita Bryant are good examples).
no subject
Date: 2009-12-09 09:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-12-10 12:21 am (UTC)