I'm back, but probably not for long
Oct. 2nd, 2006 08:10 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
uberreinigerThis new job keeps me busy. It looks like you'll be seeing a lot less of me on LJ than you might be used to :( Sorry about that, but I'll try my best.
The first few days have been not too bad. Lots of tedious training modules along with some training on the registers and receiving. I'm afraid of winding up the odd man out on the management team; they all really love sports and going out drinking and then... there's me. It's kind of like working in a frat house really, and they're the kind of people who all socialize outside of work. But they seem very happy to have me working there, so hopefully that will remain.
Something noteworthy. On the module on opening the store, they listed turning on the store's Muzak among the steps. Now if you have ever stepped inside a store of the company for which I work (herein after referred to as VOID CIRCLE PHARMACY to protect the innocent,) then you know they have the most horrific muzak you could ever hear outside of a doctor's waiting room. I'm just amazed that in their own material they actually call it "muzak." I would think they'd call it something awful like the Shopping Experience Soundtrack or VOID CIRCLE PHARMACY RADIO or something of that nature. But no, they admit it is muzak.
And I am a little frightened by what is considered "muzak" these days. I always thought that for a song to be muzak it had to meet two criteria. 1) To not have been recorded after 1983 and 2) To be so bleak and weepy that it makes you want to give a slow sensual blowjob to a shotgun. And our company's muzak does do that. All the expected players are there: James Taylor, Jim Croce, that weepy "Cat's In The Cradle" song. But "Angel" by Sarah McLachlan? Granted, it's a downer of a song, but it's not "muzak" is it? Someone thinks it is and that makes me sad. And "Downtown Train" by Rod Stewart? COME ONE! That's a great song!
If I had it in me I would find out who is responsible for these attrocities and write them an angry letter. But alas, they're already so vain they would probably think that letter was about them wouldn't they? Wouldn't?
The first few days have been not too bad. Lots of tedious training modules along with some training on the registers and receiving. I'm afraid of winding up the odd man out on the management team; they all really love sports and going out drinking and then... there's me. It's kind of like working in a frat house really, and they're the kind of people who all socialize outside of work. But they seem very happy to have me working there, so hopefully that will remain.
Something noteworthy. On the module on opening the store, they listed turning on the store's Muzak among the steps. Now if you have ever stepped inside a store of the company for which I work (herein after referred to as VOID CIRCLE PHARMACY to protect the innocent,) then you know they have the most horrific muzak you could ever hear outside of a doctor's waiting room. I'm just amazed that in their own material they actually call it "muzak." I would think they'd call it something awful like the Shopping Experience Soundtrack or VOID CIRCLE PHARMACY RADIO or something of that nature. But no, they admit it is muzak.
And I am a little frightened by what is considered "muzak" these days. I always thought that for a song to be muzak it had to meet two criteria. 1) To not have been recorded after 1983 and 2) To be so bleak and weepy that it makes you want to give a slow sensual blowjob to a shotgun. And our company's muzak does do that. All the expected players are there: James Taylor, Jim Croce, that weepy "Cat's In The Cradle" song. But "Angel" by Sarah McLachlan? Granted, it's a downer of a song, but it's not "muzak" is it? Someone thinks it is and that makes me sad. And "Downtown Train" by Rod Stewart? COME ONE! That's a great song!
If I had it in me I would find out who is responsible for these attrocities and write them an angry letter. But alas, they're already so vain they would probably think that letter was about them wouldn't they? Wouldn't?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2006-10-03 02:01 am (UTC)