
Yes, they are much more love than non-intact baby boys. Especially if you have taken the obvious solution and rebuilt them as killer cyborgs. Those are decidely
not love.
Oh wait! I get it! It's some kind of statement about circumcision. Gotcha. Still kinda dumb, though.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 04:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 05:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 06:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 07:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 10:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 10:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 03:32 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 06:48 am (UTC)"Not needed" does not prohibit dramatically reducing a number of risks (some very hyperaggressive cancers resistant to chemotherapy, for instance) that are very untreatable even with high technology.
A decent medical case for male circumcision can be made simply by reading up on urology. If you think the baby has a life expectancy of more than 40 years.
no subject
Date: 2006-05-31 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 05:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 06:08 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 06:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-05-30 06:36 pm (UTC)kids are love, but killer-ciborg-kids are DA BEST! They can love you to pieces, literally.
no subject
Date: 2006-06-02 04:15 am (UTC)