uberreiniger (
uberreiniger) wrote2006-03-02 12:21 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
He calls it "God's will." What about the lousy, inedible pizza his company makes? Is that also "God's will?"
Call me a liberal Christian and a Universalist if you will, but I choose to believe in a God who wants me to have good pizza.
Moving on to the article, I hate to say it, but while his model society is puritanical, it's not unconstitutional. Nowhere in the United States Constitution are you guaranteed the right to birth control, pornography, or even an abortion. Now if he attempts to create legal statutes against such things in this town, then yes, he will be in trouble and can look forward to a long future of court rulings (assuming this town has a court,) being overturned by higher courts. Based purely on what the article says, however, it looks like this is a town where such goods and services will simply be unavailable, not outlawed.
How is it different from, say, pharmacists who refuse to fill perscriptions for birth control pills on religious grounds? (a practice I do not agree with) Because those individuals are attempting to force their values on the larger society. This looks like a place where people of a particular conviction can retreat from society to practice their belief. And that's nothing new in this country. Amish and Mennonite communities are noteworthy for their lack of birth control, pornography, and abortion clinics, and everybody loves them. I guess there's a double standard for the mean ol' Catholics, however.
This isn't a town I would want to live in, but if people make a choice to live there, (and in doing so, are aware they are giving up other choices willingly,) then they should be allowed to do so.
Call me a liberal Christian and a Universalist if you will, but I choose to believe in a God who wants me to have good pizza.
Moving on to the article, I hate to say it, but while his model society is puritanical, it's not unconstitutional. Nowhere in the United States Constitution are you guaranteed the right to birth control, pornography, or even an abortion. Now if he attempts to create legal statutes against such things in this town, then yes, he will be in trouble and can look forward to a long future of court rulings (assuming this town has a court,) being overturned by higher courts. Based purely on what the article says, however, it looks like this is a town where such goods and services will simply be unavailable, not outlawed.
How is it different from, say, pharmacists who refuse to fill perscriptions for birth control pills on religious grounds? (a practice I do not agree with) Because those individuals are attempting to force their values on the larger society. This looks like a place where people of a particular conviction can retreat from society to practice their belief. And that's nothing new in this country. Amish and Mennonite communities are noteworthy for their lack of birth control, pornography, and abortion clinics, and everybody loves them. I guess there's a double standard for the mean ol' Catholics, however.
This isn't a town I would want to live in, but if people make a choice to live there, (and in doing so, are aware they are giving up other choices willingly,) then they should be allowed to do so.
no subject
As for Amish/Mennonite communities... they're /communities/, not entire towns... so I don't think they fit this same case.
Personally I think the guy is wrong in acting like this and trying to force people into this... if he is trying to force people into this. It might just be the press deciding to make him look like a fundamentalist moron. Like you said, people have a choice as to wether or not to work, live and shop there. :3
OMG! just thought of something. XD What if it becomes a tourist attraction like Amish and Mennonite communities often do! "COME SEE THE WORLDS ONLY ALL CATHOLIC COMMUNITY!" But I just don't think that chicken and beer dances have quite the same flair as hand sewn quilts and wooden toys.
no subject
And you're right, you can't dictate that a business cannot sell something which it can legally sell. However, private businesses can choose to not stock any itmes they wish. I can only assume that business owners moving to this community will be ones who wish to obey the policy in the first place. Of course, there's always a chance someone will try to come in and rabble-rouse by trying to sell whatever's "objectionable."
And at that point the little man's dream would be over, because I don't think there's a legal way to stop it. They would have to go the route you speak of, by voting on business licenses preemptively.
Which, given that he's got a team of lawyers working on this, I'm sure he will do.
no subject
You'd be bankrupt in a year.