uberreiniger (
uberreiniger) wrote2006-03-02 12:21 am
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
(no subject)
He calls it "God's will." What about the lousy, inedible pizza his company makes? Is that also "God's will?"
Call me a liberal Christian and a Universalist if you will, but I choose to believe in a God who wants me to have good pizza.
Moving on to the article, I hate to say it, but while his model society is puritanical, it's not unconstitutional. Nowhere in the United States Constitution are you guaranteed the right to birth control, pornography, or even an abortion. Now if he attempts to create legal statutes against such things in this town, then yes, he will be in trouble and can look forward to a long future of court rulings (assuming this town has a court,) being overturned by higher courts. Based purely on what the article says, however, it looks like this is a town where such goods and services will simply be unavailable, not outlawed.
How is it different from, say, pharmacists who refuse to fill perscriptions for birth control pills on religious grounds? (a practice I do not agree with) Because those individuals are attempting to force their values on the larger society. This looks like a place where people of a particular conviction can retreat from society to practice their belief. And that's nothing new in this country. Amish and Mennonite communities are noteworthy for their lack of birth control, pornography, and abortion clinics, and everybody loves them. I guess there's a double standard for the mean ol' Catholics, however.
This isn't a town I would want to live in, but if people make a choice to live there, (and in doing so, are aware they are giving up other choices willingly,) then they should be allowed to do so.
Call me a liberal Christian and a Universalist if you will, but I choose to believe in a God who wants me to have good pizza.
Moving on to the article, I hate to say it, but while his model society is puritanical, it's not unconstitutional. Nowhere in the United States Constitution are you guaranteed the right to birth control, pornography, or even an abortion. Now if he attempts to create legal statutes against such things in this town, then yes, he will be in trouble and can look forward to a long future of court rulings (assuming this town has a court,) being overturned by higher courts. Based purely on what the article says, however, it looks like this is a town where such goods and services will simply be unavailable, not outlawed.
How is it different from, say, pharmacists who refuse to fill perscriptions for birth control pills on religious grounds? (a practice I do not agree with) Because those individuals are attempting to force their values on the larger society. This looks like a place where people of a particular conviction can retreat from society to practice their belief. And that's nothing new in this country. Amish and Mennonite communities are noteworthy for their lack of birth control, pornography, and abortion clinics, and everybody loves them. I guess there's a double standard for the mean ol' Catholics, however.
This isn't a town I would want to live in, but if people make a choice to live there, (and in doing so, are aware they are giving up other choices willingly,) then they should be allowed to do so.
no subject
As for Amish/Mennonite communities... they're /communities/, not entire towns... so I don't think they fit this same case.
Personally I think the guy is wrong in acting like this and trying to force people into this... if he is trying to force people into this. It might just be the press deciding to make him look like a fundamentalist moron. Like you said, people have a choice as to wether or not to work, live and shop there. :3
OMG! just thought of something. XD What if it becomes a tourist attraction like Amish and Mennonite communities often do! "COME SEE THE WORLDS ONLY ALL CATHOLIC COMMUNITY!" But I just don't think that chicken and beer dances have quite the same flair as hand sewn quilts and wooden toys.
no subject
And you're right, you can't dictate that a business cannot sell something which it can legally sell. However, private businesses can choose to not stock any itmes they wish. I can only assume that business owners moving to this community will be ones who wish to obey the policy in the first place. Of course, there's always a chance someone will try to come in and rabble-rouse by trying to sell whatever's "objectionable."
And at that point the little man's dream would be over, because I don't think there's a legal way to stop it. They would have to go the route you speak of, by voting on business licenses preemptively.
Which, given that he's got a team of lawyers working on this, I'm sure he will do.
no subject
You'd be bankrupt in a year.
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
Avoid Dominos.
Check. Been doing that for a long time now.
no subject
no subject
no subject
Although he's unlikely to have to worry about this scenario at least until Jeb Bush is out of office.
no subject
Sure like-minded people might move there (don´t ask me what they´ll be working on, cuz I wouldn´t know) but the children of all these very catholic couples will go to university and OH! encounter the "outside" world, maybe get a job outside of AveMaria ... and never come back.
In any case, I don´t see how providing such an environment is helping this gentleman be on the side of good. It´s not anti-catholic that temptation exists, but that you give in to it. I´d spend my money support programs for pregnant teens, promoting literacy among poorer kids and all that stuff. IMHO, Ave Maria sounds like an awesome name for a social program... not so sure about a town.
no subject
no subject
Now the Papal States went belly up, so i advise against Catholic Theocracies (or any theocracy).
no subject
I mean, I don't think it would work, because Catholics are taught that if they are not monastics, they are to live in the "world." But still..
no subject
no subject
no subject
In another group I'm in, some girl was saying about how terrible this town was because "OMG! The CHIIIIDLREN didn't choose to live there, so what if they don't want to be forced to go along with strict Catholic standards just because the parents choose to move there?" I wanted to smack my head on the desk at that statement. Basically my take is like
I wouldn't choose to live in this town, but if someone else does, that's their choice. I also have heard lots of idiots saying things like "ooo! I'm gonna go visit, and bring porn and have lesbian displays of affection in the streets and hand out condoms and just show them! haha" This again, makes me realize how immature and stupid these people are, since they're usually the FIRST in line to bitch and moan without ceasing if there's anything that even HINTS at some spiritual aspect of society that they feel might be "forced" upon them. Okay... so in turn, they want to force things that they CHOOSE upon others(that these people have CHOSEN to avoid) when they don't want things that other people CHOOSE forced upon them. I get tired of everyone getting their panties up in a wad about CHURCH AND STATE!!1! (yep, heard that about this town too) whenever people choose something for religious reasons.
no subject
no subject